Pulmo is developed as an analysis tool for predicting the response of the human lung to blast insults using high-fidelity torso, lung, and lung surrogate models. Pulmo uses advanced physics solvers, including K&C’s meshfree solver FEMFRE, as well as the LS-DYNA commercial software, to predict blast-lung response simulations needed for assessing lung injury risk or lung injury mechanisms.
The human lung is a vital organ that can be vulnerable to injuries when exposed to blast. While research on preventing lung injuries to airblast has been studied for some time now, research on lung injuries due to underwater explosions (UNDEX) are much less prevent. UNDEX engenders complex physics, physiology, and potentially exacerbated lung damage and injury mechanisms than those that occur with air blast insults. Lung injuries can range from local rigidity and discomfort, to hemorrhage, edema, contusions, and ruptures. Relative to air blast injuries, underwater blasts can propagate farther, couple more effectively with the human body (due to a closer matching of impedances to shock), induce complex loading effects like cavitation at fluid-tissue interfaces, and increase the overall severity and complexity of injuries.
Pulmo was developed as a computational tool that medical researchers, safety planners, and developers of personnel protection products can use to assess and mitigate the risk of injury from blast. The software was also designed with the goal of providing insight into the actual lung injury mechanisms governing injuries, using evolving technologies like high-resolution CT scan data and meshfree computational technology like those in FEMFRE.
50th percentile male torso with rib cage
High-resolution lung model using CT-scan data
Compression Test on lung tissue surrogate material to obtain material model parameters
DISCLAIMER
This material is based upon work supported by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRDC) or U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA) under Contract No.W81XWH22C0078. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAMRDC or USAMRAA.